Vermont Surrogacy Network is the first matching organization based in Vermont, and tailored to the needs of Vermont residents who want to “stay local” for gestational surrogacy arrangements.
A gestational surrogate, or carrier, is a woman who becomes pregnant and carries a child for families (known as the “intended parents”) who would not otherwise be able to have biological children of their own.
The Burlington area has medical facilities to carry out gestational surrogacy procedures, and many carriers and intended parents in Vermont want to use this exciting process to build their family. VSN offers a naturally supportive environment to keep surrogacy local with in-person interviews, consultations and continued support from the first application to post-delivery care. Unfortunately, until now Vermonters have had to go to out-of-state organizations for matching purposes.
The Vermont Surrogacy Network intends to fulfill the need for a local matching resource, and we are extremely excited about the launch of this new endeavor. While we encourage intended parents from anywhere in the world to apply, either the gestational carrier or the intended parent(s) will be Vermont residents in every match. This will allow us to provide personalized attention to the specific needs of all of our clients, and allow face-to-face contact without clients driving hours to a major metropolitan area. While the organization is new, its founders have many years of experience in the field, and they look forward to putting their knowledge and passion for building families through gestational surrogacy to work for Vermonters. One of the founding members, Burlington attorney Kurt Hughes, put it this way: “I have been involved in the legal aspects of gestational surrogacy for more than fifteen years, and I have long seen the need for a Vermont-based organization. When Jes walked into my office for legal advice about becoming a gestational surrogate herself, I knew that the moment had finally arrived!”
Kurt M. Hughes and Jes Stumpf founded Vermont Surrogacy Network with a mission to provide Vermonters an ethical, affordable, and supportive environment in which intended parents and gestational carriers are matched and guided through the process of surrogacy. Kurt Hughes is the only Vermont attorney who is a member of both the American Academy of Adoption Attorneys and the American Academy of Assisted Reproductive Technology Attorneys. He has provided legal services for hundreds of adoptions and assisted fertility arrangements, including gestational surrogacy, as well as egg and sperm donation contracts.
Jes Stumpf has dedicated herself to children and families, working in public and private schools, as well as many non-profit family organizations. Upon deciding to become a gestational surrogate herself, she began researching surrogate agencies and was disappointed to find that there was not a local option for gestational surrogacy. Upon meeting to discuss Jes’ surrogacy options, Kurt and Jes decided it was time to put forth the vision they both shared for what is now, Vermont Surrogacy Network.
Vermont Surrogacy Network is also excited to have the local medical experience of Northeastern Reproductive Medicine, which recently reopened its doors in their new Colchester, VT location. Together we will offer local reproductive alternatives to Vermonters.
To learn more about Vermont Surrogacy Network visit VTSurrogacy.com or call (802) 497-6579.[Read More...]
From October 15th through October 18th, legal professionals from throughout the country attended the American Bar Association (ABA) Family Law Section fall conference in Stowe, Vermont. Some of the country’s most distinguished attorneys, medical and other professionals presented on current issues in family law in the United States.
As a leader in Vermont regarding the legal aspects of assisted reproductive technology (ART), Kurt Hughes was invited to speak about ART in the context of existing parentage laws and principles throughout the country in a program titled, “From Contract to Court: Strategies to Help Your Parentage Establishment Withstand Attack in the Courts”.
The ABA Family Law Section has nearly 10,000 attorney and law student members worldwide. For more information, visit the American Bar Association’s Section of Family Law at www.americanbar.org/groups/family_law.html.[Read More...]
Last week, Attorney General Eric Holder’s Weekly Video Message was focused around progress towards marriage equality in the United States.
In light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision to deny cert. on federal appeal court rulings striking bans on same-sex marriage, Holder has directed lawyers at the Department of Justice to work with colleagues and agencies to ensure federal benefits are extended to same-sex married couples in the states affected by the Supreme Court’s denial of cert.
Holder states, “We are slowly drawing closer to full equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans nationwide.” However, he also expressed his concern over the continued discrimination against same-sex couples in the states that do not support same-sex marriage, and renewed his pledge to support marriage equality if and when the issue returns to the U.S. Supreme Court.
To view Attorney General Holder’s October 17 video message, visit The United States Department of Justice Briefing Room. http://www.justice.gov/agwa.php[Read More...]
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court denied cert. on federal court appeal decisions that struck down bans on same-sex marriage. This decision (or lack thereof) meant same-sex couples could begin wedding in five more states.
The Supreme Court let decisions stand from federal appeals courts in the Fourth, Seventh, and Tenth Circuits that struck down bans on same-sex marriage in Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia, and Wisconsin. Other states that ban same-sex marriage but are under the jurisdiction of one of these three federal appeals courts – Colorado, Kansas, North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, and Wyoming – will likely follow suit and strike down their bans. To date, twenty-four (24) states allow same-sex marriage, and that number will likely increase.
The Supreme Court’s decision to deny cert. allows more same-sex couples to marry, but does not provide the national recognition of marriage equality needed for same-sex couples who live in states that continue to discriminate their marriage rights.
It is likely that the U.S. Supreme Court will grant cert. on a marriage equality case. It is also likely that, at that time, a majority of states in the U.S. will already recognize marriage equality.[Read More...]